Which of the following enhances the self-motivation of the individual being coached?

Generative Responsibility is the correct choice because it emphasizes the internal motivation of an individual by fostering a sense of ownership and accountability for their actions and decisions. When individuals recognize that they have control over their learning and growth, they become more intrinsically motivated to engage with their tasks. This approach encourages them to set their own goals, reflect on their progress, and take pride in their achievements, which ultimately enhances their self-motivation.

In contrast, the other options focus on external factors. For instance, external rewards and recognition can lead to temporary motivation but may not sustain long-term growth since individuals might begin to rely solely on these incentives for motivation. Strict performance evaluations can create pressure and anxiety, which may hinder an individual's confidence and desire to improve. Lastly, peer comparisons can result in feelings of inadequacy or competitiveness, which can detract from an individual’s intrinsic motivation by shifting focus towards how they stack up against others rather than their own growth. Generative Responsibility nurtures a more self-driven and purposeful approach, promoting sustained self-motivation in coaching scenarios.